This was a genuine concern before the Apollo missions. Some people believe humans couldn’t have passed through these belts without being exposed to lethal doses of radiation. They are made of highly energetic charged particles from the solar wind. These are two giant doughnut-shaped belts surrounding the Earth. Perhaps the most convincing argument that the landings were faked has to do with something called the Van Allen belts.
After a little waving while the astronauts planted the flags into the Moon’s surface, they have remained still ever since. And there is a fluttering effect because the weak gravity on the Moon is not strong enough to uncrumple the flag. This makes it look like the wind is stopping it from hanging down.
A horizontal rod at the top of the pole holds the flag unfurled. How could this happen when the Moon has no wind? It appears to flutter in the wind in some photos. A well-known example is the American flag that Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin placed on the Moon. Most likely it was a piece of hair or thread introduced during copying.Ī more subtle argument that the landings were faked is based on various misunderstandings of Nasa equipment and lunar physics. Again, analysing the original photo there is no anomaly – the ‘C’ isn’t there.
#Moon landing fake movie
There appears to be a C written on it, like a lettered movie prop. Others point to an oddity in a photo of a Moon rock taken during the Apollo 16 mission.
When these images are copied or scanned some of this detail is lost completely, giving the effect that the crosshair is behind the object in certain shots. But testing here on Earth has shown that the brightly lit objects make the crosshairs appear fainter. If the images were real this would be impossible, suggesting someone painted them on. This meant starlight lost the battle against the very bright surface of the Moon, too dim to show up in photos.Īnother common argument is that the crosshairs that appear in many Apollo images sometimes appear to be behind objects in the photos. All manned missions to the Moon took place in sunny daytime. Unfortunately, this argument rests on the photos being snapped during the lunar night.
#Moon landing fake free
Free from Earth’s light pollution and hazy atmosphere, you would expect to see thousands of stars in all the astronauts’ images. One of the most popular conspiracy arguments is that there are never any stars in Apollo photos. If someone uses these oddities as evidence, what do you say? Here are the most common arguments that support this view, and why each of them is wrong. The argument for any of these viewpoints rests on finding evidence that the landings were faked.Īnd more often than not, people point out peculiarities in specific images or videos to deal the critical blow. They claim the US government faked Apollo 11 and later missions either to deal a crucial blow to the USSR in the Space Race, or to boost Nasa funding or to divert attention away from the Vietnam war. Most people take it as gospel that the US government, Nasa, the 12 astronauts in total who have walked on the Moon and the 400,000 people involved in the Apollo programme would have neither the will nor the way to fake one of humanity’s greatest ever achievements.īut there are those who think the landings were a hoax. If you find yourself in a debate questioning whether humankind first stepped on the Moon on 20 July 1969 the chances are that you are woefully underprepared. Moon fact: With a powerful amateur telescope you can see the Apollo landing sites and, if you look at the photos from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, you can spot the remnants of the Apollo missions yourself. But even today, 50 years later, people discuss conspiracy claims online, on television programmes and around the dinner table.
0 kommentar(er)
